Over the past few years the natural hair movement has sparked debate which has had a significant impact on the way some black women view beauty.
Natural hair, meaning unprocessed hair, has always been considered as “… unattractive and undesirable” writes Essence Hair blogger Chime Edwards.
Edward asserts that black women have become accustomed to straightening, relaxing and weaving their hair to liken it to the western aesthetic.
Edwards refers to movements such as the Civil Rights Movement that changed the way Africans view themselves as well as their hair.
These movements have given way for a renewed appreciation of the power and symbolism associated with black hair.
An increased number of black women have started embracing their natural locks or ‘kinks’, as the natural hair community puts it.
Celebrities such as Solange, Chrisette Michele, Viola Davis, Lupita Nyongo and Janelle Monae have stared flaunting their hair on the Red Carpet. This has inspired more black women to embrace their naturally coily hair.
22-year old Rhodes University student, Mikhaela Köhlo who began her natural hair journey 2 years ago speaks about the natural hair movement as a stepping stone to change the perception of beauty.
Who’s hair is it anyway?
Reality TV star Kylie Jenner recently shared photos of herself with dreadlocks on Instagram.
The 17 year old received so much negative criticism that the photos were down 2 days later. Among the negative criticism emerged the debate about why Jenner is not entitled to taking a certain portion of Rastafarian culture and using it for a photo shoot. Critics called it, ‘cultural appropriation’.
Cultural appropriation as defined by Fordham University Law Professor Susan Scafidi is “Taking intellectual property, traditional knowledge, cultural expressions, or artifacts from someone else’s culture without permission.”
“This can include unauthorized use of another culture’s dance, dress, music, language, folklore, cuisine, traditional medicine, religious symbols, etc. It’s most likely to be harmful when the source community is a minority group that has been oppressed or exploited in other ways or when the object of appropriation is particularly sensitive, e.g. sacred objects.”, says Scafidi.
We personally don’t see Jenner spotting locks as cultural appropriation but it did get us thinking about two important dilemmas facing the natural hair movement.
The entitlement of natural hair, in the form of dreadlocks, braids and afros as well as the double standard we’ve come to see from those opposing the natural hair movement.
Culture is about identity and tradition. As noted by Khanyi Nomoyi “Our hair is political, historical and economical.”
In this light, when white women claim to be embracing the natural hair movement, they are in essence stealing something which they have no connection to – a struggle that they will never understand.
This is where the entitlement of the natural hair movement comes in.
Should any woman only embrace henna, dreadlocks and other historically-loaded traditions when they have fully adopted all aspects of that particular culture? Is it okay for the “Kylie Jenners” of the world to not educate themselves about the history of dreadlocks in the Rastafarian community, but merely embrace non-white people’s cultures for fashion sake?
Some of the positive comments that Jenner’s dreadlocks garnered were “Edgy”, “Fresh” and “Rad”. Immediately the non-white community saw this as a prime example of double standards.
Whenever white people rock a new look, especially one that isn’t historically part of their culture, they are seen as “edgy” or “fresh” as if they’ve brought a new idea to the table.
When black people embrace their natural hair, it’s often seen as unpresentable or just downright dirty. Why is that?
It may sound mean hearing black people asking for white people to just sit out the natural hair movement because it’s “not for them”, but black people are tired of having natural styles that are part of their identity and cultured only being seen as beautiful when a face with a lighter pigment graces it.
Perhaps the debate is not so much about hair as it is about deconstructing the image of beauty presented by media. Perhaps, as one gentleman put it, women, all women, just want to feel beautiful and accepted for how they look and we should each do so in a way that appropriately represents our identities, struggles and triumphs.
What are your thoughts on the natural hair movement?
Leave us your comments below.